|
Wild Trout VII, Yellowstone National Park, October 2000
J.R.
Webb, F.A. Deviney, Jr., B.J. Cosby, A.J. Bulger, J.N. Galloway
Department
of Environmental Sciences
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
Introduction
Although recent and
prospective reductions in precursor emissions may reduce the impact of
acidic deposition on surface water resources in many regions of the United
States, some areas remain at risk [U.S. EPA, 1995]. As summarized by Cosby
et al. [1991] and Herlihy et al. [1993], the Mid-Appalachian region is
one of the areas in the United States most affected by acidic deposition
and surface waters in this region are susceptible to further acidification
for several reasons; including high rates of acidic deposition, the presence
of watersheds with base-poor bedrock, and the delayed-response properties
of regional soils. The
results of the 1987 VTSSS survey indicated that the mountainous watersheds
of Virginia that support native brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) are
especially sensitive to the effects of acidic deposition [Webb et al.,
1989].
|
These watersheds
are predominantly on public lands managed by the National Park Service,
the U.S.D.A. Forest Service, and the Commonwealth of Virginia. Researchers,
resource managers, and public user groups are interested in whether
the reductions in sulfur emissions mandated by the Clean Air Act
of 1990 will be sufficient to effect improvements in the acid-base
status of these waters. Other monitoring programs have been too
broadly based to adequately assess changes in this specific set
of waters.
We have taken
two approaches to measuring status and changes in water quality.
The first approach involves comparing results for near-census surveys
separated by great intervals in time: An approach that requires
organization and training of a large number of people for one-time
events. The second approach involves analyses of trends in data
obtained from quarterly sampling on a subset of the population:
An approach that requires a continuous dedication of resources.
We have examined data obtained through both of these approaches
for specific evidence of recovery from acidification--decreasing
concentrations of sulfate and increasing ANC.
|
|